Goodall,Hudson, and Maynard Reflection

http://tamaraazrak.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/save-the-animals.gif

When reading Goodall, Hudson, and Maynard, I could not help but think of how passionate these individuals are about the environment and the animals that are a part of it. I felt a connection with the stories that were featured in the reading. I know that I have mentioned it before but I truly have a passion and love for animals. I guess I can say that it was my mother who instilled this love in me. She has always had a special place in her heart for any animal. She taught my siblings and I what love really means. My personal opinion is that to love an animal that has no voice and cannot speak words like a human, you have to become completely involved with the animal. You can build a type of bond that is very unique. I know it may sound crazy, but it is something I believe that can be much stronger than any bond with a human. I agree that for any change to occur and to help save build up and preserve our environment and the animals is “The link between the human being and the other animals with whom we share Planet Earth, this connection we can establish with another life-form- that for many makes it possible to carry on” (184).

We have to realize that the world was here long before humans were and that animals were also a part of the earth before humans. Just as it was mentioned, “Without plants, animals (including ourselves) cannot survive” (174). It seems that society is mainly concerned with taking action after tons of damage has occurred. This includes but does not limit to, pollution of lakes, forests destroyed by too much logging, and vanishing plant and animal species. I agree that “Through a combination of human determination, scientific know-how, and the resilience of nature, even badly compromised habitats can be restored” (174). I understand that there are people who are working very hard to help our environment but it is not enough. There are more people who just do not care or are not informed well enough to understand. I think that these issues should not be only taught in schools but it needs to really be advertised constantly. Just like smoking commercials. It is something that people probably do not want to see, but it can make a difference.

It is sad to think that individuals are sometimes afraid to show compassion of any kind. I believe that “In our materialistic world, where all that consists is the bottom line, human values of love and compassion are too often suppressed” (183). I do not think that keeping emotions separate makes any kind of work better. I believe that having emotion makes someone more passionate about their work and to perform the job better. I relate this to the career path I have chosen which is nursing. I do not think that if I did not have a caring heart, I would be able to be successful in this career. You have to be able to put yourself in the shoes of someone else to feel their distress, to fully understand. This is what we have to do for the environment and animals. The many species that have come and gone did not have a voice. We need to make them have a voice and do all that we can to preserve our world. We have to have hope, “If we are without hope we fall into apathy, without hope nothing will change” (185). The world is quickly disappearing because of what we have done and continue to do. Change has to come.

Orr Reflection

http://designshack.net/design/biophilia-

To think that society today mostly consists of people that are biophobic is alarming. I have never heard of such a word. It is sad to say that I’m a part of the generation that Woody Allen spoke of that was, “raised on television, walkman radios, and video games” (186). I enjoyed this reading that David Orr wrote about comparing biophilia and biophobia.

Biophilia is something that I believe can be acquired. I do not agree that “biophilia is innate and a sign of mental and physical health” (187). It does not make sense for those individuals that have never been exposed to nature or greenery to have an innate sense to want to be around nature. These individuals are used to the concrete life of tall buildings, smog and tons of people. I do think that if they are exposed to nature, that they may could possibly have another viewpoint on nature or acquire their own sense of nature.

I agree that Orr does not think that biophobia is okay. I think that to help evolve something like biophilia it does have to start as a child. Just as anyone would want their child to have good manners, it is something that has to be shown when a child is young or there is a possibility of trouble later in life. Children do need “more natural places, places of mystery and adventure where children can roam, explore, and imagine” (205). Places like this can help a child learn about nature and come to understanding and appreciation for it.  It is true that “children are rushed into adulthood too soon” (187). We have to think that the children of today are the future, if they are not allowed to develop of sense of nature, what will happen to our world later?

I think that biophilia is attainable and something that can help change our world for the better. We just all need to come to an understanding and realize the trouble that is happening. We need to realize that money can’t fix everything. It has to begin with the people first. Just as Orr mentioned to attain agape, we need mentanoia, which means “transformation of one’s whole being” (202). It sounds easy to say that we have love nature, but truly having a connection and feeling the love whole heartedly is a completely different thing. 

Carson Reflection

http://us.123rf.com/400wm/400/400/kolobsek/kolobsek1201/kolobsek120100003/11874336-the-tree-costs-on-the-polluted-and-pure-earth.jpg

For many individuals, living in a clean environment with no pollution or hazards is something the mind can only imagine. It is very sad to only think that the earth could be a place of clean air, beautiful flowers, animals of all species, and healthy humans.  I enjoyed how Carson described a beautiful place that eventually disappears. It is understandable that people question why terrible things are happening to the environment, but do they actually comprehend that it is the people causing such harmful effects?

Carson discusses a very important hazard to the environment that “has crept upon us almost unnoticed” which is chemical pollution (152).  People feel that with the use of pesticides to keep down weeds or the use of insecticides is harmless. Carson mentions that there are five hundred chemicals produced each year which are used here in the U.S. Does this sound crazy? I think it does, and to think of the harsh chemicals that plant, animals, and humans are exposed to. No wonder there are so many different causes of cancer, especially in the foods we eat. We are not safe from these chemicals. I liked how Carson mentions that the chemicals “should not be called “insecticides” but “biocides” (155). That is exactly what chemicals are doing to the environment, slowly killing it off.

There are people who are trying to make a difference and make all individuals see the harm being done. Carson mentions that “we train ecologists in our universities and even employ them in our governmental agencies” (159). Carson is right, there is information out there, but who really is listening? I agree with Carson, that there is little awareness of the truth behind chemical use.  I liked that Carson feels “the sugar coating of unpalatable facts” needs to come to an end (160). If we do not start showing what really is happening with real time footage or examples, people are not going to grasp the harm occurring to the environment with the use of these hazardous chemicals. Although, if people were to see the TRUE facts, would they change their way of life?

Shiva Reflection

http://www.sciencelearn.org.nz/var/sciencelearn/storage/images/science-stories/where-land-meets-sea/sci-media/images/biodiversity/726408-3-eng-NZ/Biodiversity_full_size_landscape.jpg

We are now living in a world of better technology, advanced medicine, and discovering new ways to prolong life. Is this really what we should be doing? Shiva’s reading has allowed me to see that all of the advancements we have made may not be the best route to continue. In this process, we are hurting our own environment and the many species that we share it with.

Before beginning this course, I was aware of the noticeable changes to the environment. Such as forests being demolished for the use of trees, but I never understood the affects that it had on all other things that relied on the forest to survive. I think, was I just naive or did I not think twice, because it wasn't directly affecting me?  I feel strongly that “All life forms have an intrinsic worth and a right to evolve freely on their own terms” (40). We are not allowing this to happen. We are eliminating many species selfishly and not thinking of the long term affects this will have. It is vital for humans to prolong all species of life.

I have always had a huge soft spot for any living animal. I never thought of the microorganisms that are also living that help support human life. I learned about microorganisms this past summer in my microbiology course, which was very intriguing. David Suzuki states “We owe practically all life to bacteria” (Naked Ape to Super Species, 1999, 43). I always thought that microbe’s caused sickness, which there is harmful bacteria, but they mostly keep us alive. Microorganisms are the main reason all living things survive, beginning with the soil.

The last two quotes that I found very enlightening are “The lesson from biodiversity is co-operation, not competition. It is that the big depends on the small, and cannot survive by exterminating the small (44). I have come to appreciate all that this environment has to offer and realize that mankind will not live forever, if we continue to act selfishly. We should not think that we can substitute biodiversity resources. All resources that we use to survive currently, were here before was. Instead of overlooking the small, we need to start looking out for the small.